biggestweek2014cover
MedDirCover
HousingHeaderSmall
EMBCCover 

 linkedinfacebooktwitter

WTOLLogo1

Fox1

Home Double-dipping bill covers politicians
Double-dipping bill covers politicians
Written by Larry Limpf   
Thursday, 15 December 2011 16:50

As soon as the ink was dry on a bill he recently introduced, State Representative Rex Damschroder had to explain it would apply to all public employees, including those elected to office.

Rep. Damschroder (R –Fremont) said he filed HB 388 to end the practice known as “double dipping” in which public employees are permitted to receive their pension benefits while continuing to work in a public sector position.

The press release Damschroder issued to announce the bill’s introduction specifically states it would apply to “all government workers, including elected officials” and that they would be denied their pensions while working under the “retire-rehire” format.

However, in the first section of the bill, public employee is defined as:

“Any person holding an office, not elective, under the state or any county, township, municipal corporation, park district …”  The bill continues to spell out other public entities, including authorities, boards, councils, universities, commissions “created by action of the general assembly or by the legislative authority of any units of local government named…”

If there is any doubt about a position being public or not, the public employees retirement board will determine their status and its decision will be final, the bill says

The words “not elective” caught the attention of some, including bloggers, who were quick to opine office holders should be held to the same standards.

Last week, Damschroder issued a statement saying the bill covers elected officials too.

“Simply put, HB 388 does not exempt elected officials,” it says. “Under current Ohio law, a public employee, by definition, does not include elected officials because individuals elected to public office are given the option of whether they wish to join PERS. If an elected official chose not to be under PERS, they would never receive retirement benefits from the state in the first place. In the vast majority of cases, an elected official would opt to join the retirement system.

“Once that elected official is under PERS, the provisions of HB 388 would apply to them just like they would any other state worker. In fact, as I worked to draft HB 388 over the last several months, I was specific that the bill contain zero exemptions…”

He explains further, the bill would prevent future state workers from engaging in double dipping.

“It is not my intent to retroactively punish state workers who are following current law,” the statement says, adding the bill would improve the “sustainability of our public retirement system by ending the practice of double dipping in the future.”
   

Comments (1)Add Comment
Not So sure
posted by joseph dittmer, December 15, 2011
I will have to research HB388 but the hubub over public employees rfetiring and then getting rehired has been hyped as such a monstrous idea, I bet few people know the facts about these people. A few cases of inappropriate arrangements which mainly are by superintendents or high ranking administrators belies the facts that most of these people who come back to work are saving the state tons of money. Let me explain-first--being retired they do not require health insurance coverage like a new employee would, Second--they have to start at step one not the same pay they were getting upon retirement-again saving money. third--they can be let go at practically any time without any hassle from union contracts. Fourth--you have the benefits of decades of experience at rock bottom prices. Having done just this, I came back to a job that few other professionals want at 40% reduction in pay to do the same thing I was doing before retirement. Any analyst who is using their logic hat will tell you that far and away makes more sense than to hire a totally new person, if you can find one. There are absolutely no benefits for no hiring a retiree. This hype that is being pushed by certain political sycophants only preys on the emotions of people who may be having hard times and kn little about the facts. This new bill is just another attack to demoralize state employees and serves only the republicans who can't stand government in any form and have been harrassing employees from the moment their victorious 77,000 vote victory was validated last year. It is about time we elect people who look out for our citizens not for themselves and narrow interest in Ohio.

Post a comment
Login on the right column to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

By: Larry Limpf

Contact e-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Show Other Articles

Banner
Banner

Polls

If you found a penny on the floor, would you pick it up?
 
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner

The Current Weather for Millbury, OH USA

Login




Log in